Does monitoring mean automatic changes to my network?
No. Detection and remediation are separate capabilities. Customers determine which actions are authorised; the initial assessment is observational by default.
Protection / After the initial assessment
Continuous threat monitoring compares current evidence with an accepted security baseline and emerging risk information. AI Defence is designed to identify new vulnerabilities, unexpected exposure and suspicious changes after the initial audit, while keeping response within customer-approved boundaries.
The specified baseline records known hosts, services, ports, users, packages, network paths, workloads, configuration and approved exceptions. It is established after findings and authorised changes have been reviewed. It must not silently treat every newly observed state as acceptable.
A legitimate release may introduce a service or change a package. Those changes should be reconciled with authorised work. Unexplained changes need investigation; approved exceptions need an owner and enough context to distinguish an accepted risk from an overlooked one.
Authentication, system, application, web, network, firewall and audit logs provide different parts of the picture. AI Defence’s initial audit includes log availability, integrity, retention, alerting and centralisation, as well as blind spots that would limit future monitoring.
Continuous describes the intended ongoing operating model. It is not a promise that every event is detected instantly or that an unspecified uptime or response SLA applies. Collector availability, data freshness and supported detection coverage must be visible to the customer.
An unexpected connection or process is evidence to correlate, not automatic proof of an intrusion. Repeated signals, affected identities, exposure and known indicators can change the priority and confidence of a finding. The report should make that confidence understandable.
A monitoring alert does not automatically authorise isolation, credential revocation or firewall modification. Responses remain subject to the permitted scope. Following an approved action, the original condition and relevant service health need retesting before the incident is recorded as resolved.
No. Detection and remediation are separate capabilities. Customers determine which actions are authorised; the initial assessment is observational by default.
No. Coverage, telemetry and detection methods have limits. The design requires those limits and incomplete checks to be reported rather than presenting silence as proof of safety.
Start with understanding
Discuss the assessment scope, current capabilities and the control you need with Altari Systems.